The Soda Pop
Denny-Blog logo

Misteri mundurnya pendiri Yahoo

nahlhoo Jerry Yang, pendiri Yahoo!, resmi melepaskan "Mainan"-nya itu.

Dalam siaran pers, Selasa, 17 Januari 2012,
Jerry Yang menyatakan mundur dari Yahoo! Ia juga mundur dari semua posisi di perusahaan mesin pencari tersebut.
Ada apa di balik mundurnya bos kelahiran Taiwan 6 November 1968 ini?

Jerry Yang mengatakan resmi mundur dari Dewan Direksi Yahoo!. Ia juga mundur dari Yahoo Japan and Alibaba Group.
"Masa kerja saya di Yahoo!, sejak berdiri sampai sekarang, telah memberi pengalaman paling menggembirakan dan menyenangkan dalam hidup saya. Namun, sudah waktunya saya mengejar keinginan lain di luar Yahoo!,"
ungkap Jerry Yang dalam surat kepada Ketua Dewan, Roy Bostock.

Jerry Yang telah membesarkan Yahoo! selama 17 tahun. Setelah mundur, Jerry Yang meminta Scott Thompson menjadi Kepala Pejabat Pelaksana karena kemampuannya.
"Saya yakin seluruh tim akan membimbing Yahoo! memasuki masa depan menggairahkan dan hasil bagus," ucapnya.

Yang menjabat sebagai anggota Dewan Direksi Yahoo! sejak perusahaan itu berdiri pada 1995. Ia melahirkan situs pencari itu bersama David Filo. Jerry Yang menjadi kepala pejabat pelaksana mulai Juni 2007 sampai Januari 2009.

Kepergian Jerry Yang terjadi hanya dua pekan setelah Yahoo! merekrut pendiri PayPal Scott Thompson sebagai CEO baru.
Sejumlah analis menduga mundurnya Jerry Yang ini terkait dengan upaya Microsoft mengambil alih Yahoo!. Dan Ketika Jerry Yang menjadi CEO pada 2008, ia menolak tawaran Microsoft Corp senilai US$ 44 miliar.

Jerry Yang masih ngotot tak mau melepaskan sahamnya kepada Microsoft. Pada awal Januari, ia mengatakan takkan mendukung upaya pengambilalihan seluruh perusahaan itu.
Sebagian pemegang saham Yahoo! telah menyerukan pengunduran diri Jerry Yang. Padahal, sejumlah analis menyebutkan bahwa Jerry Yang adalah 'nyawa' bagi Yahoo!

Back to posts
[2018-08-07 13:30] Albertclale:

The prostate is the central portion of a male's reproductive :. It secretes fluids that assist the transportation and activation of sperm. The prostate related is found just as you're watching rectum, below the bladder and around the urethra. When there is prostate problem, in most cases really miserable and inconvenient to the patient as his urinary system is directly affected.

The common prostate health issues are prostate infection, enlarged prostate and cancer of prostate.

Prostate infection, also called prostatitis, is easily the most common prostate-related problem in men younger than 55 years. Infections in the prostate are classified into four types - acute bacterial prostatitis, chronic bacterial prostatitis, chronic abacterial prostatitis and prosttodynia.

Acute bacterial prostatitis will be the least common of varieties of prostate infection. It is brought on by bacteria based in the large intestines or urinary tract. Patients can experience fever, chills, body aches, back pains and urination problems. This condition is treated through the use of antibiotics or non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) to alleviate the swelling.

Chronic bacterial prostatitis is a condition of a particular defect inside gland along with the persistence presence of bacteria inside the urinary tract. It can be a result of trauma towards the urinary tract or by infections received from other regions with the body. A patient can experience testicular pain, small of the back pains and urination problems. Although it is uncommon, it can be treated by removal in the prostate defect accompanied by the utilization antibiotics and NSAIDs to deal with the soreness.

Non-bacterial prostatitis is the reason approximately 90% of most prostatitis cases; however, researchers have not yet to create what causes these conditions. Some researchers feel that chronic non-bacterial prostatitis occur as a result of unknown infectious agents while other think that intensive exercise and lifting may cause these infections.

Maintaining a Healthy Prostate

To prevent prostate diseases, a proper meals are important. These are some in the actions and also hardwearing . prostate healthy.

1. Drink sufficient water. Proper hydration is necessary for general health and this will also maintain your urinary track clean.

2. Some studies advise that a couple of ejaculations weekly will assist to prevent cancer of prostate.

3. Eat red meat in moderation. It has been shown that consuming greater than four meals of beef per week will increase the probability of prostate diseases and cancer.

4. Maintain a proper diet with cereals, vegetable and fruits to ensure sufficient intake of nutrients required for prostate health.

The most crucial measure to look at to be sure a proper prostate is to choose regular prostate health screening. If you are forty years and above, you must select prostate examination at least 12 months.

[2018-03-03 23:31] AHeanceincesty:

The ED resulting from that surgery might be either temporary or permanent. Core maca from your supplier energetix can be an herb that tests quite nicely for assorted males.

[2014-09-05 07:15] 4qbpdZCG:

...Medical researcher and long-time <a href="">crtiic</a> of peer review, David Horrobin,... has perhaps improved the accuracy and reliability of conventional research published in medicine, but it has done so at the price of innovation.No, this is wrong. An author can submit his/her article to multiple publishers in the same domain. For, example, an author whose writing articles in the technology/engineering domain, can in fact submit his/her paper to Elsevier, (largest in technology/engineering) or other publishers in this domain. A submitted paper might be rejected from all of those private publishers (but this is free-market anyway) , it could be accepted by all, which I have seen this before, ie, a single paper is being published in multiple journals (from different publishers, different journal titles, but the same domain, eg Computing or Physics, etc...). It is vital that the publisher (privately owned) selects only what their reviewers think its worth being published. The quality of what they published must be maintained at a high level or otherwise their readership drops and they lose market (free-market anyone?). So, there is competition out there by private publishers to get the best.Jerry said...It was the growth of government involvement in education and, especially, the government’s lavishing of money on research that called for the blind-review screening process.Jerry is being dishonest here or otherwise being incompetent for not checking his facts before writing his misleading blog post. The government does not dictate to private publishers as the likes of Elsevier, IEEE, (American Physical Society), (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics) and many others. Perhaps the government dictates to its own non-popular publishers, but they don't have any influence on private publishers on what they choose to publish.

[2014-09-04 14:36] fePtdZXmF:

...Peer review is the prsoecs by which millions of dollars of government money are handed out to researchers in medicine and the physical sciences.This is not what peer review is defined as I understand. I think Jerry is confused between government funded research and the prsoecs of selecting articles regarded as high quality to be published by a (private) publisher, ie, the reviewing prsoecs is carried out by a selected group of outstanding peers and expertise in that domain, be it Physics, Economics, Medicines, and so on. One such private publisher, ie, a non-government one is , which they publish journals in almost every branch of academics, Physics, Economics, Finance, Health/Medicine, Computing, Engineering and so forth. I haven't counted but a rough guess put it at perhaps over thousands different journals (based on the numbers shown on the link cited above for journal names under A only). Any peer reader here on this thread can review my guess and correct me if I am wrong.Jerry said...Peer review, a “blind” prsoecs in which the names of author and evaluator are concealed from each other, requires two or three so-called peers to read a paper or proposal to judge the quality of actual or proposed research before acceptance.Now Jerry defines peer review prsoecs correctly here, which he didn't in his first attempt (I highlighted that in my first paragraph). Now, I would like to point out that Jerry is wrong to state that reviewers are being concealed. Perhaps in the 1960s , 1970s, etc, but today in the age of internet, as far as I know, the reviewing panels are not concealed at all. Their names are known to potential authors out there who want to submit a paper for possible publication. For example, Elsevier has a journal called , which listed all the names of the reviewers. Just click on the link and see it for yourself. I believe that all the thousands other Elsevier journals do the same by listing the names of the reviewers.

[2012-11-13 08:51] girish.hinna:


[2012-11-13 08:53] girish.hinna:


Post a comment